Book reviews, new books, publishing news, book giveaways, and author interviews

Dignity, atrocity and narrative self-deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro


 Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro

[the spoiler-averse may wish to look away]'

We all this land of ours'Great BritainI would say that it is the very'lack of obvious drama or spectacle that sets the beauty of our land apart. What is pertinent is the calmness of that beauty, its sense of restraint. So muses Stevens, erstwhile butler to Lord Darlington, as he embarks upon a brief sabbatical at the behest of his new employer, a sabbatical in which he reflects on the actions, and indeed, inaction, of his past, and sets out to make sense of a series of unknowns that plague his conscience.'There are parallels, believes Stevens, between the proud stoicism of is native land and of his profession, with both exhibiting, at their finest, a sense of dignity. A true butler should comport his or herself with utter dignity, offering no clue as to his desires or intentions.

Stevens lives and breathes his role as one of Britains finest: as his new employer, an ebullient American, puts it, hes a genuine old-fashioned English butler, not just some waiter pretending to be one. And yet, Stevens needs to be pressed to confirm this, having remained tight-lipped about his previous employment for reasons, we are told, out of fear of impropriety: speaking of ones past employment is not the done thing, he says, using his new employers unfamiliarity with the way things are done as leverage. Though his statement may initially be taken at face value, we soon begin to see that Stevens is perhaps not the paragon of virtue he presents himself as.

For one so taken up with conduct and comportment and properness, Stevens is rather less one for veracity than we might expect. In fact, not only does he have a capacity for self-deceptionan extraordinary one, as it turns outbut of deceiving others as well.'His transgressions at first seem minor, but soon grow into something large and ghastly. And yet Stevens paints everything with a veneer of dignity, having us look through the lens of measured professionalism he applies to his life.

He offers excuses and justifications for the most minor of misdemeanours, a sleight of hand that would have us believe that such a mild-mannered man could not, surely, be capable of any wrongdoing, or of succumbing to any of the weaknesses of the human spirit.

Take, for example, his preference for calling the former Darlington Hall housekeeper by her maiden name of Miss Kenton, though she has been married for some years now. The fact that her recent letters may indicate that her marriage is in trouble provides further justification for this impropriety, he argues, although as Stevens continues to reflect on his time at Darlington Hall, we see hints of the scarcely acknowledged romance that has haunted him since.

And yet, he argues with cool emotionlessness that there is nothing of note here: Stevens visits to Miss Kentons parlour after hours, are entirely above board in that they are strictly work related. No matter that Miss Kenton hints at one point that marriage may be an option: It occurs to me that you must be a well-contented man. Here you after, after all, at the top of your profession, every aspect of your domain well under control. I really cannot imagine what more you might wish for in life.

A stringently emotionally repressed man, Stevens purports to conduct his entire life within the boundaries allowed by his position, noting that even when off-duty, a butler still remains a butlerand it is within this professional cocoon that he is able to safely live his life without having to take any sort of personal responsibility. He rejects Miss Kentons gift of a floral arrangement out of the fear of blurring the boundaries of his work and personal life; his habit of reading romance novels is, he says, purely for the purposes of improving his verbal skills. He responds to the news of his fathers death with the words, I see, then upon being asked whether he wishes to view the body, defers to his workload, adding, Im very right busy just now. In a little while, perhaps.

Stevens would have us think that he does not exist beyond his status as a butler, with even his clothing marked by his professional life:'I am in the possession of a number of splendid suits, kindly passed on to me over the years by Lord Darlington himself, and by various guests who have stayed in the house and had reason to be pleased with the standard of service here. These suits, he muses are rather too old-fashioned these days, highlighting just how much his life has been delimited by his work. And yet, when he travels out to the countryside on his holiday, he allows others to labour under the mistaken assumption that he is a man of importance himselfit is only when he is directly asked about his title that he admits to being a butler.

These deceptions form a web of quiet concealments and duplicity, although Stevens continues to assert that he has always conducted himself with nothing less than the utter dignity he sees as so integral to his role. And indeed, one supposes that this is true enough, save for the fact that by evoking this conception of dignity and of the master as one whose will cannot be questioned, Stevens is able to extricate himself from any moral culpability.

And since, as it turns out, Lord Darlington is a Nazi sympathiser, this continued reliance on impartial, disinterested dignity is perhaps the greatest, most horrific self-deception of all. When two Jewish staff members are dismissed, Stevens believes that his duty in this instance [is] quite clear. He adds, that although a difficult task, it is one that demands to be carried out with dignity. Indeed, when asked directly about his opinions about his employer, he is utterly circumspect, retreating into ignorance and self-deception and speaking of his loyalty.'After all, he notes, those who allow strong feelings to affect their work will inevitably see their careers come to nothing as a direct consequence.

And yet, although he is all too aware of his employers chilling ideological position, he argues that his fate [is] ultimately in the hands of those great gentlemen at the hub of this world. Indeed, he says, How can one possibly be held to blame in any sense because, say, the passage of time has shown that Lord Darlingtons efforts were misguided, even foolish? With his culpability resting solely with another to whom he has given his loyalty, be believes that it is quite illogical that I should feel any regret or shame on my own account.

The Remains of the Day is a quiet, mannered novel that juxtaposes dignity with atrocity and loyalty with culpabilitya theme that can of course be extrapolated more widely to wartime horrors and crimes. Stevens endless deception and indeed self-deception renders him unreliable as a narrator, resulting in an ambiguous, challenging read where the full truth will always remain unknown. But then, that is part of Stevens loyalty, is it not?

Rating: star Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishigurostar Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishigurostar Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishigurostar Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishigurostar Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro

Support Read in a Single Sitting by purchasing'The Remains of the Day'from

Amazon'|'Book Depository UK'|'Book Depository USA'|'Booktopia

or support your'local independent.

Other books by Kazuo Ishiguro:

 Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro Dignity, atrocity and narrative self deceit in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro


  1. Have you see the movie Stephanie? I havent read the book I must admit

    • Stephanie /

      I havent, but I certainly plan to! The books wonderfulI do hope you get a chance to read it.

  2. I listened to The Remains of the Day on audio and it was really good! I forget who the narrator was, but he was excellent.

  3. Ive only seen the movie, I admit. It was wonderful! Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson were terrific in the lead roles and it was a fascinating glimpse into pre-war Britain. You did want to punch the butler in the nose sometimes.

    • Stephanie /

      Ive heard wonderful things about the film, but my local video shop doesnt have a copy, which is a shame. (They stick barely any of the things I want to watch, which probably says something about my taste!)